Founded upon Dissent, no king, no lord, no president-held the right to rule without the consent of the people.

Sorry Joe we did not, “… find ourselves confronted with the ongoing crisis in Ukraine…” We created it, as we have done so many other times in past wars around the world. It’s no wonder Volodymyr Zelenskyy is having a tantrum because he can’t immediately hide under the skirt of NATO.

During the breakup of the USSR in 1991, Russia pulled troops out of Germany because George Bush promised not to move NATO east. Since then, we permitted Hungry, and Czech Republic to enter NATO, along with Poland, where we quickly put our nukes.

Political trust is irrevocably broken due to leaders, who have no idea of their limits. Which includes Zelenskyy, a comedian and actor with a knack for putting himself in the spotlight. It’s the kind of subpar thinking that has failed since Vietnam and the world continues to buy-in, especially when it’s served with tyrannical U.S. influence.

You say America’s bold stance is because, it is morally wrong for Russia to occupy Ukraine. Yet it’s okay for apartheid Israel to commit ethnocide in the Palestinian territory, or for the U.S. to secretly cause civil wars or coups through CIA influenced architectures. You make sanctions sound righteous, when they are as brutal as war on civilian populations. And you pull troops out of Afghanistan as it collapses but fight by proxy, in Ukraine. What is your truth?

Sanctioning Russia into economic devastation, will only force them to join with our enemies. Then, when this war has worn down our military and drained the populous emotionally. There will be an international incident in the south China sea or in the Strait of Hormuz that will actually affect America directly. We will then be flat out of juice.

Prior to the Russian invasion we called Ukraine, a rogue state, a haven for computer hacking and financial corruption. Yet now we give them hundreds of millions to exasperate war. In the end, considering the catastrophic carnage to the country, they might have fared better under Russia. China is communist and its people prosper. Paul Collier said it best, those at the bottom do no worse under communism than capitalism. The real problem he says is, “…psychopaths, and they’re around 3% worldwide…” So, the problem is not just Russia, it is the 3% on all sides.

Face it, America stopping communism is a fear ploy for political control to avoid far more pressing issues on our plant—like or planet! We the people, need to stop accepting bait and switch tactics that avoid the broader issues. You can use PR whitewash and call me a rebel or non-patriot. But let’s take this in for a moment. My wife’s family came to America on the Mayflower. As is she today, all her female ancestors were Daughters of the American Revolution and our family worked hard to honor that and support this country through thick and thin.

Keep foremost in your mind, that this is a country founded by rebels that saw a wrong and fought to make it right. Accepting the status quo went out of style in 1776. The time to see what has not worked and make a change is upon us presently. Slaughter and destruction in the duplicitous name of stopping communism must end or we will have learned nothing from Vietnam—a war we lost in a country that was added to the tourist map. Yes, Joe it is time to eliminate the self-interest of “those 3%”, that wag the dog, and bring this country back to the principles it was founded upon.

Kevin j Palmer

Opinions expressed, reflect only the signed author’s views and not the wider views of SMA Institute, or Strategic Management Advisors. They belong to the content creators and not www.thequietrich.com  Kevin j Palmer, the organization, its affiliates, or employees. Strategic Mgmt. Advisors/SMAI, author Kevin Palmer http://reawakeninganamericandream.com assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in the content of this site. Information contained herein is provided on an “as is” basis with no guarantees of completeness, accuracy or usefulness. Kevin Palmer Arizona www.kevinpalmerscottsdale.com makes reasonable efforts to keep information correct, but makes no representations or warranties express or implied about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability with respect to its information. Any reliance you place on this material is strictly at your own risk and Palmer Private Equity or Peace through Prosperity http://KevinjPalmerAuthor.com writer-rebel-producer-poet will not be liable for any false, inaccurate, inappropriate, or incomplete information on these websites. All rights reserved by Kevin J Palmer https://www.linkedin.com/in/kevin-j-palmer-3694bab1/

The post NATO is Not for Sissies first appeared on Kevin J Palmer Scottsdale.

As is the case with banks, redacted private equity fund cannot issue a check in a name other than the investor: https://www.seclaw.com/introduction-private-placements/   Previously the same error was made when you assumed the bank broke that rule with the , redacted when in fact, it was cut in abbreviated stencil to fit the check and was not “fraud” as suggested. Also misunderstood during redacted liquidation was settlement period: https://www.ally.com/do-it-right/investing/what-are-unsettled-funds/

Ignorance to the reality of how things actually work caused malicious accusations that lead to panic and loss of a good financial opportunity. So, rather than continue that flawed pattern of thinking let’s move forward with verifiable facts, that I’m happy to impart, once I get my head around our return and other pressing issues.

For now, as a thumbnail; the easiest option was clearly putting it into the existing “trust savings account at redacted” that redacted refenced when requesting the check. The “redacted meeting cancelled due to redacted absolving redacted as Trustee” is immaterial! Names coming off such accounts is common, as banks prefer singular trustee anyway, but the 2006 Trust title, cannot change and deposit could have been made. If his information was inaccurate and there is no account, as alluded to by redacted, then we should drill down to address options openly as a group, rather than in cloak and dagger, as it were.

Demanded by you early on was, “Also, do not make any decisions for the redacted going forward without all seven redacted agreeing” to which I immediately agreed, but now everyone needs to be involved to avoid hypocrisy. The core decision making group are trustees. Unlike with the bank, redacted can’t remove himself from 2006 Trust (itself) unless group protocols are followed. If that was done during his July 17 meeting, we have not yet seen the 30-day notification. If it was for any other reason and trust recommendations were made as stated. redacted needs to personally send them for our review. This will assure information he received was correct and his resulting advice accurate, thus avoiding confusion experienced with a check request ending up on redacted.

Thankfully, I do have a technical solution to present that will solve issues in order to get this done, but first, we all need to come to common ground otherwise we risk irreversible mistakes if the money is paid out incorrectly or without complete consensus. It was my commitment to guarantee look-back safety on the money. To keep that intact, this needs to be a two-way street with everyone vetting conclusions so our family can commence healing.

Understand redacted is a paid advisor not a decision maker. We can all hire an attorney, as redacted threatened, but it’s ultimately up to trustees (& group of seven peripherally) to decide on actions within limits of the trust document. Also remain aware redacted mental capacity is diminished and her decisions need to be without influence, manipulation or under mental anguish, which mom is now. redacted is in no condition to be making redacted during this trauma and doing so can only raise questions under elder law.

Agreeing to disperse this money to redacted and forging look-back issues is indeed a big leap, especially for those who only a month ago were panicked by “stirring the trust”, or “land the house is on being at risk”. It is wiser to be prudent and take the necessary time to sort this out because an emotional solution, rather than a practical one, could only makes the hornets’ nest this has become, far worse!

At one time or another, everyone has errored in regard to the complications of our redacted estate. Short of listing mistakes by us or our redacted, we should take a closer look at ourselves first, then accept the issue is not a check but misunderstandings, suspicions, or fear of being gypped. This spiraled out of control from the onset because of process ignorance, but as accountability and personal awareness manifest, we will rebuild with true facts.

Any questions not clear from my prior emails can be openly discussed in a new dialog going forward. As paranoid notions fade and forgiveness happens, we will gain clarity and proceed with accuracy. Then, in measured steps, we can execute fiduciary duties of trustees (and redacted), whose obligation is to act in the best interest of the grantor, the trust and trust’s beneficiaries. This seems the best and most reasonable way to get back to the referenced normality.

If this process seems slow and painful remember, so was getting here during a backdrop of the worst period in our life history. Even the best families have had such issues—but only the greatest of them come to resolutions. Consequently, I will muster patriarchal duty, with your input, to provide a proper course of action that does not undermined the integrity of the trust, to keep these funds compliant, as they were in the Private Equity investment.

More importantly, the ongoing process will be a fulcrum that begins family healing and allays questions by agreement and not appeasement by payoff. At that point redacted will truly have genuine harmony between redacted, that redacted so well deserves at this point in her life.

Kevin Palmer Arizona

#authorkevinJpalmer

KevinJPalmerAuthor.com

reawakeninganamericandream.com

http://thequietrich.com/

http://smainstitute.com/

KevinJPalmer.com

palmerholdinggroup.com

strategicmanagementadvisors.com

Author and Journalist Kevin Palmer – SMA Institute

Kevin Palmer Terminated From First  base on over throw, worked his way up in Wall Street biggest firms. After learning everything he could from them, teamed up with other executives to advise smaller firms. Kept his license with a corporate clients, to day trade…a bad idea (story for another time or book)…but that addiction inspired his Behavioral Finance firm, sMa Institute which did groundbreaking research still used today in investment policies at some Wall Street firms.

The post RE: In full disclosure first appeared on Kevin J Palmer Scottsdale.